Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011640949
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011694966
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011799925
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010380976
This paper considers potential alternatives to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) system of deposit insurance in the United States. We review the international and historical literature on deposit insurance which finds higher government involvement in the deposit insurance system...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013027612
Most people believe the benefits of deposit insurance provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) clearly exceed the costs. However, a growing literature suggests the benefits of FDIC insurance are overstated while the costs are understated. We add to this literature by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013027826
Most depositors love the security offered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), but few realize the true costs of deposit insurance. Since government deposit insurance is not priced at “actuarially fair” rates, it raises the costs of insurance for depositors and encourages...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012937420
In this policy brief we review the theoretical argument for government-provided deposit insurance and compare it to the actual costs observed under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) in the United States. Contrary to theoretical arguments, deposit insurance is not free in practice....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013096382
The Diamond–Dybvig model is often cited as a theoretical justification for government-provided deposit insurance. Guaranteeing bank deposits removes the temptation for individual depositors to run on the bank and thereby precludes the need to ever use the deposit insurance. Hence, deposit...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013065974