Showing 1 - 10 of 28
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001209442
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001204267
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013442474
Contrary to claims by Gul and Pesendorfer (2008), I show that standard economics makes use of non-choice evidence in a meaningful way. This is because standard economics solely grounded in the theory of choice is "incomplete". That is, it has content that can not be revealed with any general...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003894920
We consider a decision maker who is unaware of objects to be sampled and thus cannot form beliefs about the occurrence of particular objects. Ex ante she can form beliefs about the occurrence of novelty and the frequencies of yet to be known objects. Conditional on any sampled objects, she can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015069541
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000870747
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000870748
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003518368
This paper investigates the behaviour in repeated decision situations. The experimental study shows that subjects show low or no risk-aversion, but put very high value on the opportunity to sell the lottery in every stage of the decision problem. There is evidence that risk attitudes depend on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009582412
In this paper, we consider a decision-maker who tries to learn the distribution of outcomes from previously observed cases. For each observed sequence of cases the decision-maker predicts a set of priors expressing his beliefs about the underlying probability distribution. We impose a version of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003747359