Showing 1 - 10 of 10
We replicate three pricing tasks of Gneezy, List and Wu (2006) for which they document the so called uncertainty effect, namely that people value a binary lottery over non-monetary outcomes less than other people value the lottery's worse outcome. Unlike the authors who implement a verbal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003803120
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003903661
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003914722
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003553096
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003606058
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014202652
Luckman et al. (2018) experimentally tested the conjecture that a single model of risky intertemporal choice can account for both risky and intertemporal choices, and under the conditions of their experiment, found evidence supporting it. Given the existing literature, that is a remarkable...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014351420
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011342684
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014252505
We replicate three pricing tasks of Gneezy, List and Wu (2006) for which they document the so-called uncertainty effect, namely, that people value a binary lottery over non-monetary outcomes less than other people value the lottery's worse outcome. While the authors implemented a verbal lottery...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013157185