Showing 1 - 5 of 5
In this paper, the assumption of monotonicity of Anscombe and Aumann (1963) is replaced by an assumption of monotonicity with respect to first-order stochastic dominance. I derive a representation result where ambiguous distributions of objective beliefs are first aggregated into “equivalent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011280266
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011833204
We analyze the impact of risk and ambiguity aversion using a lifecycle recursive utility model. Both risk and ambiguity aversion are shown to reduce annuity demand and enhance bond holdings. We obtain this result using an intertemporal framework in which we can vary both risk and ambiguity...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013241836
Experts often disagree. A decision-maker may be averse to such expert disagreement. Existing models of aversion to expert disagreement rest on ambiguity-averse preferences adopting a unanimity principle: If all experts consider one choice better than another, so should the decision-maker. Such...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013175548
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012105863