Showing 1 - 10 of 357
How do human beings make decisions when, as the evidence indicates, the assumptions of the Bayesian rationality approach in economics do not hold? Do human beings optimize, or can they? Several decades of research have shown that people possess a toolkit of heuristics to make decisions under...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011926917
optimal choice (or collection of choices) given this preference relation, there is another preference relation that satisfies … EUOL plus the Savage axioms, for which this choice is also optimal. -- ambiguity ; decision theory ; Knightian uncertainty …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009509223
choice the DM can make) can also be rationalized by the DM maximizing her subjective expected utility for some subjective …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013101803
For choice with deterministic consequences, the standard rationality hypothesis is ordinality, i.e., maximization of a … weak preference ordering. For choice under risk (resp. uncertainty), preferences are assumed to be represented by the … objectively (resp. subjectively) expected value of a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function. For choice under risk, this implies …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014025530
The prospect theory is one of the most popular decision-making theories. It is based on the S-shaped utility function, unlike the von Neumann and Morgenstern (NM) theory, which is based on the concave utility function. The S-shape brings in mathematical challenges: simple extensions and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003980000
contracts. We test this by presenting agents with a choice between comparative reward schemes and independent contracts, which …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009545983
A rigorous reconstruction of scenario-based real choice making reveals the incompleteness of decision-modeling and the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011283827
This paper studies how organizational design affects moral outcomes. Subjects face the decision to either kill mice for money or to save mice. We compare a Baseline treatment where subjects are fully pivotal to a Diffused-Pivotality treatment where subjects simultaneously choose in groups of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009763855
This paper studies how organizational design affects moral outcomes. Subjects face the decision to either kill mice for money or to save mice. We compare a Baseline treatment where subjects are fully pivotal to a Diffused-Pivotality treatment where subjects simultaneously choose in groups of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009764385
This paper studies how organizational design affects moral outcomes. Subjects face the decision to either kill mice for money or to save mice. We compare a Baseline treatment where subjects are fully pivotal to a Diffused-Pivotality treatment where subjects simultaneously choose in groups of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009755329