Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001476454
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001476414
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001597330
The paper re-expresses and complements arguments against the normative validity of expected utility theory in Robin Pope (1983, 1991a, 1991b, 1985, 1995, 2000, 2001, 2005,2006, 2007). The objections concern the neglect of the evolving stages of knowledge ahead (stages of what the future will...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010270013
The paper re-expresses arguments against the normative validity of expected utility theory in Robin Pope (1983, 1991a, 1991b, 1985, 1995, 2000, 2001, 2005, 2006, 2007). These concern the neglect of the evolving stages of knowledge ahead (stages of what the future will bring). Such evolution is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010270422
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001421872
The paper re-expresses arguments against the normative validity of expected utility theory inRobin Pope (1983, 1991a, 1991b, 1985, 1995, 2000, 2001, 2005, 2006, 2007). These concern the neglect of the evolving stages of knowledge ahead (stages of what the future will bring). Such evolution is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003943834
The paper re-expresses and complements arguments against the normative validity of expected utility theory in Robin Pope (1983, 1991a, 1991b, 1985, 1995, 2000, 2001, 2005, 2006, 2007). The objections concern the neglect of the evolving stages of knowledge ahead (stages of what the future will...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003850661
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009426393
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009304888