Showing 1 - 9 of 9
If a decision maker, in a world of uncertainty à la Anscombe and Aumann (1963), can choose acts according to some objective probability distribution (by throwing dice for instance) from any given set of acts, then there is no set of acts that allows an experimenter to test more than the Axiom...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009509223
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011793464
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009242983
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003748602
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012138039
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014248432
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013473408
If a decision maker, in a world of uncertainty à la Anscombe and Aumann (1963), can choose acts according to some objective probability distribution (by throwing dice for instance) from any given set of acts, then there is no set of acts that allows an experimenter to test more than the Axiom...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010319975
A decision maker (DM) is asked to make choices from a set of acts, which entail both risk and uncertainty in the sense of knight (1921). Extending Raiffa's (1961) argument I show that, provided the DM can choose acts objectively randomly (by flipping her own fair coin, for instance), provided...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013101803