Showing 1 - 10 of 88
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012004168
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011790603
Many centralized matching schemes incorporate a mix of random lottery and non-lottery tie-breaking. A leading example is the New York City public school district, which uses criteria like test scores and interviews to generate applicant rankings for some schools, combined with lottery...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012453541
Many centralized matching schemes incorporate a mix of random lottery and non-lottery tie-breaking. A leading example is the New York City public school district, which uses criteria like test scores and interviews to generate applicant rankings for some schools, combined with lottery...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012930855
Centralized school assignment algorithms must distinguish between applicants with the same preferences and priorities. This is done with randomly assigned lottery numbers, nonlottery tie-breakers like test scores, or both. The New York City public high school match illustrates the latter, using...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011989205
Lottery estimates suggest oversubscribed urban charter schools boost student achievement markedly. But these estimates needn't capture treatment effects for students who haven't applied to charter schools or for students attending charters for which demand is weak. This paper reports estimates...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010510717
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010477261
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011747052
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011420912
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012029662