Showing 1 - 10 of 3,473
Boards of directors face the twin task of disciplining and screening executives. To perform these tasks directors do not have detailed information about executives' behaviour, and only infrequently have information about the success or failure of initiated strategies, reorganizations, mergers...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011349199
compensation level, pay-performance sensitivity, risk-taking behavior, accounting conservatism, and turnover …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012841373
This study investigates the importance of corporate boards by exploiting the predictions from a learning model in which capital markets process information and learn about the quality of incoming directors. The estimates suggest that upon the arrival of a new director, uncertainty about...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012904103
We examine how boards decide on CEO compensation depending on how informative stock prices are. In order to mitigate the endogeneity of board decisions, we use extreme mutual fund flow-driven trading pressure as an exogenous shock to stock price informativeness. Consistent with informed boards...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012905487
This paper contributes to the corporate governance literature by developing and testing theory regarding positive and negative synergies between the CEO's and the board's human and social capital. Using a sample of 360 biotechnology firms that went public between 1995 and 2010, we demonstrate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012938501
We examine whether boards are sufficiently well-informed to make efficient decisions on CEO compensation. In order to mitigate the endogeneity of board decision on CEO compensation, we use mutual fund flow-driven trading pressure as an exogenous shock to stock price informativeness. Consistent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012970983
We analyze how the reputational concerns of boards influence executive compensation and the use of hidden pay. Independent boards reduce disclosed pay to signal their independence, but are more likely to use inefficient hidden pay than manager-friendly boards. Stronger reputational pressures...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012976117
By examining board appointments of outside directors who have previously fired a CEO, we study how directors' intolerance of failure influences firm performance and risk-taking. Such directors appear to benefit firms with weak monitoring, but hurt firms in innovative industries. Firms appointing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013005741
CEOs of public (listed) firms earn more than their counterparts in similar private (unlisted) firms. This can either be because rent extraction is easier in public firms than in private firms, or because managing a public firm involves more legal and institutional responsibilities than managing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012849653
results hold even when controlling for other governance mechanisms such as CEO wealth, CEO turnover, board composition, and …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012932733