Showing 1 - 10 of 16
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003214809
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002665041
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001536792
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003867212
The paper re-expresses and complements arguments against the normative validity of expected utility theory in Robin Pope (1983, 1991a, 1991b, 1985, 1995, 2000, 2001, 2005, 2006, 2007). The objections concern the neglect of the evolving stages of knowledge ahead (stages of what the future will...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003850661
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003900545
Conclusions favorable to flexible exchange rates typically accord with expected utility theory in ignoring the costs that exchange rate uncertainty generates for governments, central banks, firms and unions in: (i) choosing among acts; and (ii) existing until learning the outcome of the chosen...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003421397
It is here shown that the extension of expected utility theory to multiple periods destroys the axiomatic base by introducing timing contradictions in what the chooser knows at a single time point. It is shown that some of these timing contradictions remain even if, as Samuelson (1952) proposed,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003421402
The paper re-expresses arguments against the normative validity of expected utility theory inRobin Pope (1983, 1991a, 1991b, 1985, 1995, 2000, 2001, 2005, 2006, 2007). These concern the neglect of the evolving stages of knowledge ahead (stages of what the future will bring). Such evolution is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003943834
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009304888