Showing 1 - 10 of 119
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003726071
Substantial academic interest and public policy debate centers on campaign finance reform. Campaign resources can provide benefits to constituencies if candidates use them to fund the distribution of useful information. On the other hand, voters can potentially be harmed if candidates trade...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003359160
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009630365
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003364189
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011576571
We model two-candidate elections in which 1) voters are uncertain about candidates' attributes; and 2) candidates can inform voters of their attributes by sending advertisements. We compare political campaigns with truthful advertising to campaigns in which there is a small chance of deceptive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014204646
We collected and analyzed the data sets of all majoritarian Baron and Ferejohn (1989 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev.) experiments through 2018. By exploiting the variation of experimental parameters such as group size and discount factor we are able to test whether or not the theoretical point predictions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012840441
We study experimentally the properties of the majority runoff system and compare them to the ones of plurality rule, in the setup of a divided majority. Our focus is on Duverger's famous predictions that the plurality rule leads to a higher coordination of votes on a limited number of candidates...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012868355
We investigate experimentally the effects of corrupt experts on information aggregation in committees. We find that non-experts are significantly less likely to delegate through abstention when there is a probability that experts are corrupt. Such decreased abstention when the probability of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013047178
One argument against secret ballots is that such procedures lead to more selfish voting behavior and that public voting can increase prosocial voting and the likelihood of prosocial outcomes when voters are not subject to intimidation and coercion from outside interests. We investigate this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012920727