Showing 1 - 10 of 10
In this paper, we build on the emerging literature on group decision-making to study the so-called ‘group shift’ effect, i.e., groups are less risk-averse than individuals. Our study complements past research in two ways. First, we study the group shift effect under two sources of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014182351
We address the question as to whether judgmental overconfidence, as assessed by probability miscalibration, is related to positive illusions about the self. We first demonstrate that judgmental overconfidence measured with interval production procedures can be considered a trait, due to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013000986
Most decision-making research in economics focuses on individual decisions. Yet, we know, from psychological research in particular, that individual preferences can be sensitive to social pressures. In this paper, we study the impact of a group environment on individual preferences for risky...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013000993
This article presents the results of an experiment designed to test theoretical predictions about the impact of public compensation schemes and ambiguity on insurance and self-insurance decisions. Consistent with theory, we find that government assistance significantly reduces willingness to pay...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013127788
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009125595
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009266864
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009775797
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011459241
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014307808
Testing whether risk professionals (here insurers) behave differently under risk and ambiguity when they cover catastrophic risks (floods and earthquakes) and non-catastrophic risks (fires), this paper reports the results of the first field experiment in the United States designed to distinguish...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013116360