Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012145082
This paper experimentally studies the role of a compromise option in a repeated battle-of-the-sexes game. We find that in a random-matching environment, compromise serves as an effective focal point and facilitates coordination, but fails to improve efficiency. However, in a fixed-partnership...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012927123
We conduct one of the first laboratory experiments and noncooperative analyses of the de-centralized matching market with transfers (Koopmans and Beckmann,1957; Shapley andShubik,1972; Becker,1973). Some theoretical predictions align with but some differ from experimental evidence. Stable matching,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012834566
This paper experimentally investigates the importance of sacrifice in affecting people’s reciprocal behavior. Our design allows us to exactly pin down how sacrifice of the sender’s own payoff matters for her perceived kindness from the eyes of the receiver in a sender-receiver game, without...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013289539
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012239282
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011586785
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014552776
We experimentally study the effects of advice on decision-making in a dictator game. In the experiment, participants receive no advice, selfish advice, or fair advice before making decisions. Advisors in our experiment do not receive any financial incentives for their advice. We find that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014357664
We propose a novel mechanism to mitigate the provisions of public bads in large groups. In the baseline setup, players choose their neighbors, and a greater number of neighbors brings benefits. They also decide whether to provide a public bad that yields benefits to themselves but imposes costs...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014344543
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014550918