Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009687267
Thus far, most approaches to resolving the global warming externality have been quantity based. With n different national entities, a meaningful comprehensive treaty involves negotiating n different binding emissions quotas (whether tradeable or not). In post-Kyoto practice this n-dimensional...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012459018
Climate change is a global "free rider" problem because significant abatement of greenhouse gases is an expensive public good requiring international cooperation to apportion compliance among states. But it is also a global "free driver" problem because geoengineering the stratosphere with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012460038
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011392007
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002390528
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002390531
Climate change is a global "free rider" problem because significant abatement of greenhouse gases is an expensive public good requiring international cooperation to apportion compliance among states. But it is also a global "free driver" problem because geoengineering the stratosphere with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013089400
It is difficult to resolve the global warming free-rider externality problem by negotiating many different quantity targets. By contrast, negotiating a single internationally-binding minimum carbon price (the proceeds from which are domestically retained) counters self-interest by incentivizing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012993242
Thus far, most approaches to resolving the global warming externality have been quantity based. With n different national entities, a meaningful comprehensive treaty involves negotiating n different binding emissions quotas (whether tradeable or not). In post-Kyoto practice this n-dimensional...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013062175
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011699230