Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003811388
A ranking of journals is manipulable if a particular journal's position can be improved by making additional citations to other journals. We introduce a simple ranking method that is not manipulable and is invariant to citation intensities, journal scaling and article-splitting. The ranking of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008668738
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003985844
The evaluation of scientific output has a key role in the allocation of research funds and academic positions. Decisions are often based on quality indicators for academic journals and over the years a handful of scoring methods have been proposed for this purpose. Discussing the most prominent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009521668
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009734918
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009538169
The evaluation of scientific output has a key role in the allocation of research funds and academic positions. Decisions are often based on quality indicators for academic journals and over the years a handful of scoring methods have been proposed for this purpose. Discussing the most prominent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014171492
A ranking of journals is manipulable if a particular journal's position can be improved by making additional citations to other journals. We introduce a simple ranking method that is not manipulable and is invariant to citation intensities, journal scaling and article-splitting. The ranking of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010494433
The evaluation of scientific output has a key role in the allocation of research funds and academic positions. Decisions are often based on quality indicators for academic journals and over the years a handful of scoring methods have been proposed for this purpose. Discussing the most prominent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010494499