Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Using hundreds of significant anomalies as testing portfolios, this paper compares the performance of major empirical asset pricing models. The q-factor model and a closely related five-factor model are the two best performing models among a long array of models. The q-factor model outperforms...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011279578
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011337567
Motivated from investment-based asset pricing, we propose a new factor model that consists of the market factor, a size factor, an investment factor, and a return-on-equity factor. The new model [i] outperforms the Carhart (1997) four-factor model in pricing portfolios formed on earnings...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009697761
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009665928
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010442479
Motivated from investment-based asset pricing, we propose a new factor model consisting of the market factor, a size factor, an investment factor, and a return on equity factor. The new factor model outperforms the Carhart four-factor model in pricing portfolios formed on earnings surprise,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013099823
An empirical q-factor model consisting of the market factor, a size factor, an investment factor, and a profitability factor largely summarizes the cross section of average stock returns. A comprehensive examination of nearly 80 anomalies reveals that about one-half of the anomalies are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013032212
In a multiperiod investment framework, firms with high expected growth earn higher expected returns than firms with low expected growth, holding investment and expected profitability constant. This paper forms cross-sectional growth forecasts, and constructs an expected growth factor that yields...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011969143
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012034746
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011888412