Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010339758
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010467328
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012820233
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011708524
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011900508
Auditors' low-balling in initial engagements is a longstanding concern for regulators and others. We examine the determinants and consequences of low-balling using more recent data. We provide evidence that auditors are likely to low-ball if they are “Big N” auditors, expect future revenues...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012902906
Using a unique setting in which mandatory audit firm rotation was required from 2006-2010, and in which both audit fees and audit hours were disclosed (South Korea), this study provides empirical evidence of the economic impact of this policy initiative on audit quality, and the associated...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014185770
This study investigates the association of audit fee pressure with an inverse measure of audit quality, misstatements in audited data, during the recent recession. Fee pressure in a year is measured as the difference between benchmark “normal” audit fees and actual audit fees. We find fee...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013067599
This study provides novel information about the consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) by documenting differential audit fee shocks accompanying implementation of SOX 404(b) internal control tests and reports for clients in three size categories: large accelerated filers (LAFs), small...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012963576
Lead auditors frequently rely on work performed by Other auditors, especially when auditing clients with operations in multiple countries. The PCAOB has expressed concern that the quality of such group audits may differ depending on whether the Lead auditor accepts or declines responsibility for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012899697