Showing 1 - 10 of 12
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003017731
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003346793
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003853412
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008826396
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003385223
English fertility history is generally regarded as having been composed of two re-gimes: an era of unregulated marital fertility, from at least 1540 to 1890, then the modern era, with regulated marital fertility, lower for higher social classes. We show there were in fact three fertility regimes...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008657362
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010469026
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011494392
Children early in the birth order get more parental care than later children. Does this significantly affect their life chances? An extensive genealogy of 428,280 English people 1680-2024, with substantial sets of complete families, suggests that birth order had little effect on social outcomes...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014512834
English fertility history is generally regarded as having been composed of two regimes: an era of unregulated marital fertility, from at least 1540 to 1890, then the modern era, with regulated marital fertility, lower for higher social classes. We show there were in fact three fertility regimes...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014193661