Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Counterparty default risk might hamper trade and trigger a financial crisis. The introduction of a central clearing counterparty (CCP) benefits trading but pushes systemic risk into CCP default. Standard risk management strategies at CCPs currently overlook a risk associated with crowded trades....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010358435
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011779081
We investigate the effects of introducing a central clearing counterparty (CCP) on securities prices by adopting as an experimental construct the 2009 CCP reform in three Nordic markets. We find that, relative to other European economies, these countries experience market-adjusted equity returns...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010224773
If all intermediaries enter the same market-making “bet” on the same side, fast-moving capital gets tied up in a crowded trade. This creates systemic risk for a central clearing party (CCP) since multiple traders might default when the bet turns extremely sour. The CCP then has to unwind the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012905094
Counterparty risk could hamper trade and worsen a financial crisis. A central clearing party (CCP) insures traders against counterparty default and thus benefits trade. Default of the CCP however becomes a new systemic risk. CCP risk management does not account for risk associated with crowded...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012938023
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012821863
Fragmenting clearing across multiple central counterparties (CCPs) is costly. This is because dealers providing liquidity globally, cannot net trades cleared in different CCPs and this increases their collateral costs. These costs are then passed on to their clients through price distortions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012857890
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012612508
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012606958
Fragmenting clearing across multiple central counterparties (CCPs) is costly because globaldealers cannot net positions across CCPs. They have to collateralize both the short positionin one CCP and an offsetting long position in another CCP. This observation coupled with astructural net order...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013289247