Showing 1 - 9 of 9
This study uses 469,816 monthly observations of US public firms for the period 1990-2018 to document a strong positive relationship between short-term changes in financial distress risk and future stock price crashes. This result is economically significant as a one interquartile increase of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012847850
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014431447
This paper explores a puzzling historical trend in US-listed firms: Between 1950 and 2018, firm-specific stock price crashes rose from 5.5% to an astonishing 27%. Most of the literature attributes such crashes to agency reasons, i.e., executives camouflaging bad news via financial reporting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013243263
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013209764
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011774326
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009716850
Banks that follow conditional conservatism in their loan loss accounting treatments benefit from a reduction in crash risk. The key discretionary loan loss accounting channels are provisions and allowances. We show that conditional conservatism reduces crash risk of small banks during periods of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012971302
We use a large sample of non-US banks to examine the propagation of the 2007-2009 crisis. Using both stock market and structural variables we test whether the relative incidence of the crisis was better explained by crisis models or by the VaR-type analysis of the Basel system. Consistent with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012940271
We use a large sample of non-US banks to examine the propagation of the 2007-2009 crisis. Using both stock market and structural variables we test whether the relative incidence of the crisis was better explained by crisis models or by the VaR-type analysis of the Basel system. Consistent with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013115487