This paper analyzes the U.K. Supreme Courts' decision on how customers of Lehman Brothers (International) Europe, the U.K. affiliate of Lehman Brothers Inc., ruled on Part 7 of the U.K. Client Money Fund regulations. The paper also compares the differences between the U.S. Customer Segregation...

In March 2003, the Supreme Court of Argentina declared unconstitutional the controversial Presidential "Pesification" Decree, which forcibly converted billions in U.S. dollar-denominated bank deposits into pesos. This issue has subjected an already controversial Court to heightened scrutiny and...

This paper briefly outlines the sub-prime lending crisis and how it came about, including an explanation of who were the lead players involved in the popular practice of securitization, and American courts' approach to exotic financial products. It also explains some of the differences between...

Effect-based analysis is genuinely implicit in economic reasoning. The jurisprudence developed throughout the debt crisis reveals frequent recourse to effect-based analysis for the legal assessment of the compatibility of anti-crisis instruments with EU law. The dividing line between the...

Commentary about the Supreme Court’s 2021 decision in United States v. Arthrex, Inc., has focused on the nexus of patent and administrative law. But this overlooks a seismic and as-yet unappreciated copyright implication of the decision: it renders the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB)...