Showing 1 - 10 of 12
The traditional approach to flexible retirement (e.g. NDC) neglects the impact of asymmetric information on actuarial fairness (neutrality). The mechanism design approach (e.g. Diamond, 2003) gives up the requirement of neutrality and looks for a redistributive second-best benefit-retirement-age...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002523171
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003399410
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002034908
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013169114
Typically economists arguing for flexible (or variable) retirement age, but they rely on steady state analysis. In this paper we consider the replacement of a mandatory retirement system with a flexible one in real time. We show that even if early retirement is duly punished, diminishing the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012440370
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003155151
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009304010
Though the Hungarian pension system has been suffering from many erroneous rules, in the present paper we confine our attention to the rules of retirement in Hungary since 1990. In every pension system, there exist two rules which determine how the lifetime contribution (which is approximately...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011538540
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001688318
The traditional approach to flexible retirement (e.g. NDC) neglects the impact of asymmetric information on actuarial fairness (neutrality). The mechanism design approach (e.g. Diamond, 2003) gives up the requirement of neutrality and looks for a redistributive second-best benefit-retirement-age...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013318797