Showing 1 - 10 of 27
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011545151
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012108208
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010490192
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010340498
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009553538
Science funding agencies such as the NIH, NSF, and their counterparts around the world are often criticized for being too conservative, funding incremental innovations over more radical but riskier projects. One explanation for their conservatism is the way the agencies use peer review of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014322796
We quantify the impact of scientific grant funding at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) on patenting by pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms. Our paper makes two contributions. First, we use newly constructed bibliometric data to develop a method for flexibly linking specific grant...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012457777
We quantify the impact of scientific grant funding at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) on patenting by pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms. Our paper makes two contributions. First, we use newly constructed bibliometric data to develop a method for flexibly linking specific grant...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013029543
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011386117
In December 2023, the Biden-Harris Administration released a proposed framework for exercising government "march-in" rights on high-priced taxpayer-funded drugs. While both proponents and critics of the new rules view them as having broad scope, march-in rights can be exercised only on patents...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014512071