Showing 1 - 10 of 33
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000811861
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000084107
In this paper we reply to Binmore and Shaked's criticism of the Fehr-Schmidt model of inequity aversion. We put the theory and their arguments into perspective and show that their criticism is not substantiated. Finally, we briefly comment on the main challenges for future research on social...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003848846
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003409629
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003409636
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003909255
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003381059
We show that concerns for fairness may have dramatic consequences for the optimal provision of incentives in a moral hazard context. Incentive contracts that are optimal when there are only selfish actors become inferior when some agents are concerned about fairness. Conversely, contracts that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011398105
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010519156
In this paper we report on a principal-agent experiment where the principal can choose whether to rely on an unenforcable bonus contract or to combine the bonus contract with a fine if the agent's effort falls below a minimum standard. We show that most principals do not use the fine and that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010365854