Showing 1 - 10 of 14
This paper reports experimental tests of two alternative explanations of how players use focal points to select equilibria in one-shot coordination games. Cognitive hierarchy theory explains coordination as the result of common beliefs about players' pre-reflective inclinations towards the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003790704
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003375961
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003624817
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003960605
We report the results of an experimental test for feedback-conditional regret effects using a naturally occurring gamble. The properties of this gamble are likely to engage decision-makers to a greater extent than conventional abstract laboratory gambles, and be more generally exhibited by real...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002807138
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001161926
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001166261
Experimental research has shown that ordinary people often perform remarkably well in solving coordination games that involve no conflicts of interest. While most experiments in the past studied such coordination games among socially distant anonymous players, here we study behaviour in a set of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012704757
We introduce the concept of "group cohesion" to capture the economic consequences of ubiquitous social relationships in group production. We measure group cohesion, adapting the "oneness scale" from psychology. A comprehensive program of new experiments reveals the considerable economic impact...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011670948
We introduce "group cohesion" to study the economic relevance of social relationships in team production. We operationalize measurement of group cohesion, adapting the "oneness scale" from psychology. A series of experiments, including a pre-registered replication, reveals strong positive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013365380