Showing 1 - 10 of 28
In this working paper we report on two trust games: a BDM-like game which is interpreted through its use of the possibly suggestive words "show up fee," "sends," "tripled," "send back"; and an uninterpreted spatial game that does not use these words suggestive or not. In the spatial game we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009534879
In this working paper we report on two trust games: a BDM-like game which is interpreted through its use of the possibly suggestive words “show up fee,” “sends,” “tripled,” “send back”; and an uninterpreted spatial game that does not use these words suggestive or not. In the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014173914
We consider an exchange economy in which agents possess private information at the time of engaging in state contingent contracts. While com-munication of private information is permitted, the true information state is not verifiable. The enforcement of contracts is, therefore, limited by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005405675
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005405686
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001055920
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001341594
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003849538
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003917590
The burgeoning literature on the use of sanctions to support public goods provision has largely neglected the use of formal or centralized sanctions. We let subjects playing a linear public goods game vote on the parameters of a formal sanction scheme capable both of resolving and of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008688959
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009310089