Showing 1 - 10 of 7,233
experiment compares one-shot and indefinite horizon versions of random-proposer majority bargaining (the Baron-Ferejohn game …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011762571
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012289867
social dilemmas. We subject our model to data from an experimental public goods game and a risk experiment, and we measure …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009490199
predicted, we find in a laboratory public goods experiment a robust association between stronger self-control and higher levels …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009419533
We analyse two team settings in which one member in a team has stronger incentives to contribute than the others. If contributions constitute a sacrifice for the strong player, the other team members are more inclined to cooperate than if contributions are strictly dominant for the strong...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003862276
predicted, we find in a laboratory public goods experiment a robust association between stronger self-control and higher levels …-control conflict in the first place. -- self-control ; cooperation ; public good ; risk ; experiment …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009731212
We test whether generosity is related to political preferences and partisanship in Canada, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States using incentivized dictator games. The total sample consists of more than 5,000 respondents. We document that support for social spending and redistribution...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009666648
that all incumbents can find it optimal to ‘over experiment’, relative to a counter-factual in which they are sure to be in …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010366185
We present results from a multiple public goods experiment, where each public good produces benefits only if total … contributions to it reach a minimum threshold. The experiment allows us to compare a subject's behavior in a benchmark treatment …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013081090
When multiple charities, social programs and community projects simultaneously vie for funding, donors risk miscoordinating their contributions leading to an inefficient distribution of funding across projects. Community chests and other intermediary organizations facilitate coordination among...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012857834