stylized facts: (1) the positive stock-bond return correlation from 1971 to 2000 and the negative one after 2000, (2) the … coexistence of positive bond risk premiums and the negative stock-bond return correlation. We show that two distinctive shocks …---the technology and investment shocks---drive positive and negative stock-bond return correlations under two policy regimes, but …

stylized facts: (1) the positive stock-bond return correlation from 1971 to 2000 and the negative one after 2000, (2) the … coexistence of positive bond risk premiums and the negative stock-bond return correlation. We show that two distinctive shocks …—the technology and investment shocks—drive positive and negative stock-bond return correlations under two policy regimes, but …

stylized facts: (1) the positive stock-bond return correlation from 1971 to 2000 and the negative one after 2000, (2) the … coexistence of positive bond risk premiums and the negative stock-bond return correlation. We show that two distinctive shocks …---the technology and investment shocks---drive positive and negative stock-bond return correlations under two policy regimes, but …

stylized facts: (1) the positive stock-bond return correlation from 1971 to 2000 and the negative one after 2000, (2) the … coexistence of positive bond risk premiums and the negative stock-bond return correlation. We show that two distinctive shocks …-the technology and investment shocks-drive positive and negative stock-bond return correlations under two policy regimes, but …

observed government bond yields and survey-based expected average short rates. Our term premiums measured directly based on … rates, and uncover a number of important facts: 1) the bulk of the variation in medium- and long-term bond yields is driven … shocks playing the most prominent role; and 5) the secular decline of U.S. long-term bond yields over the past thirty years …