Showing 1 - 7 of 7
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011753878
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011742752
This paper provides new evidence on gender bias in teaching evaluations. We exploit a quasi-experimental dataset of 19,952 student evaluations of university faculty in a context where students are randomly allocated to female or male instructors. Despite the fact that neither students' grades...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011919532
This paper provides new evidence on gender bias in teaching evaluations. We exploit a quasi-experimental dataset of 19,952 student evaluations of university faculty in a context where students are randomly allocated to female or male instructors. Despite the fact that neither students' grades...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012892308
This paper provides new evidence on gender bias in teaching evaluations. We exploit a quasi-experimental dataset of 19,952 student evaluations of university faculty in a context where students are randomly allocated to female or male instructors. Despite the fact that neither students' grades...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012947714
This paper provides new evidence on gender bias in teaching evaluations. We exploit a quasi-experimental dataset of 19,952 student evaluations of university faculty in a context where students are randomly allocated to female or male instructors. Despite the fact that neither students' grades...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011731989
Gender biases have been documented in areas including hiring, promotion or performance evaluations. Many of these decisions are made by committees. We experimentally investigate whether committee deliberation contributes to gender biases. In our experiments participants perform a real effort...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013241675