Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010477329
We compare two genetic testing regulations, Disclosure Duty (DD) and Consent Law (CL), in an environment where individuals choose to take a genetic test or not. DD forces agents to reveal the test results to their insurers, resulting in a discrimination risk. CL allows agents to withhold that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012958445
We compare two genetic testing regulations, Disclosure Duty (DD) and Consent Law (CL), in an environment where individuals choose to take a genetic test or not. DD forces agents to reveal the test results to their insurers, resulting in a discrimination risk. CL allows agents to withhold that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012960392
Personalized medicine is still in its infancy, with costly genetic tests providing Little actionable information in terms of efficient prevention decisions. As a consequence, few people undertake these tests currently, and health insurance contracts pool all agents irrespective of their genetic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012867746
We develop a theoretical analysis of two widely used regulations of genetic tests, disclosure duty and consent law, and we run several experiments in order to shed light on both the take-up rate of genetic testing and on the comparison of policyholders’ welfare under the two regulations....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013315562
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012419503
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012221779
We compare two genetic testing regulations, Disclosure Duty (DD) and Consent Law (CL), in an environment where individuals choose to take a genetic test or not. DD forces agents to reveal the test results to their insurers, resulting in a discrimination risk. CL allows agents to withhold that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011624208
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012058426
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011853696