Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011564893
We examine potential selective reporting in the literature on the social cost of carbon (SCC) by conducting a meta-analysis of 809 estimates of the SCC reported in 101 studies. Our results indicate that estimates for which the 95% confidence interval includes zero are less likely to be reported...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010429931
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011306058
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011379952
We examine potential selective reporting in the literature on the social cost of carbon (SCC) by conducting a meta-analysis of 809 estimates of the SCC reported in 101 studies. Our results indicate that estimates for which the 95% confidence interval includes zero are less likely to be reported...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013025396
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011342390
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013448489
This paper investigates the relationship between the increasing-block-tariffs (IBT) for electricity, and the propensity of households to purchase dirty fuels. We combine RLMS-HSE, a panel household data, with the introduction of the IBT schemes for residential electricity in three experimental...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013197328
We examine potential selective reporting (publication bias) in the literature on the social cost of carbon (SCC) by conducting a meta-analysis of 809 estimates of the SCC reported in 101 studies. Our results indicate that estimates for which the 95% confidence interval includes zero are less...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013018028
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014551434