Showing 1 - 10 of 18
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003314515
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003374660
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003568821
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003389620
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002452491
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001768921
While the focus of mainstream economic analysis of liability rules remains on negligence liability, recently some legal scholars have argued for the sharing of liability. In this paper, our first objective is contribute to the debate regarding the desirability of the sharing of liability for the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012466036
In this paper we discuss a new tort liability rule, which we call super-symmetric comparative negligence and vigilance. When both injurer and victim in an accident are negligent, it provides for liability shares that depend on the degrees of negligence of the two parties, similar to the standard...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010284036
A growing body of literature suggests that courts and juries are inclined toward division of liability between two strictly non-negligent or 'vigilant' parties. However, standard models of liability rules do not provide for vigilance-based sharing of liability. In this paper, we explore the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010284040
A growing body of literature suggests that courts and juries are inclined toward division of liability between two strictly non-negligent or “vigilant” parties. However, standard models of liability rules do not provide for vigilance-based sharing of liability. In this paper, we explore the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003728417