Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Standard economic theory implies that the labelling of cash transfers or cash-equivalents (e.g. child benefits, food stamps) should have no effect on spending patterns. The empirical literature to date does not contradict this proposition. We study the UK Winter Fuel Payment (WFP), a cash...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009154821
We merge detailed household level expenditure data from older households with historical local weather information. We then test for a heat or eat trade off: do houseolds cut back on food spending to finance the additional cost of keeping warm duing cold shocks? We find evidence that the poorest...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009154838
Standard economic theory implies that the labelling of cash transfers or cash-equivalents (e.g. child benefits, food stamps) should have no effect on spending patterns. The empirical literature to date does not contradict this proposition. We study the UK Winter Fuel Payment (WFP), a cash...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009544851
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010491011
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011781366
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000805484
We study non cooperative household models with two agents and several voluntarily contributed public goods, deriving the counterpart to the Slutsky matrix and demonstrating the nature of the deviation of its properties from those of a true Slutsky matrix in the unitary model. We provide results...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008653551
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009242905
We study noncooperative household models with two agents and several voluntarily contributed public goods, deriving the counterpart to the Slutsky matrix and demonstrating the nature of the deviation of its properties from those of a true Slutsky matrix in the unitary model. We provide results...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003817622
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000854226