Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009567932
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012881646
We propose an elementary theory of wars fought by fully rational contenders that features three of the main rationalist explanations for armed conflicts: uncertainty, commitment, and indivisibility. Two parties play a Markov game that combines stages of bargaining, where offers are made, with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009506420
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009563450
This paper explores the role of conflict as a bargaining tool. It first presents a simple bargaining model with one-sided incomplete information. Parties can choose the scope of the confrontation they may want to engage in: A limited conflict that only introduces delay, or an absolute conflict...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005086773
This paper studies bargaining and conflict under incomplete information, provides an overview and a critical account of the literature on the topic and contributes with original research. We first revise models of mechanism design and sequential bargaining that take confrontation as final....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010550785
Proponents of proportional electoral rules often argue that majority rule depresses turnout and may lower welfare due to the 'tyranny of the majority' problem. The present paper studies the impact of electoral rules on turnout and social welfare. We analyze a model of instrumental voting where...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010552424
This paper studies bargaining and conflict under incomplete information, provides an overview and a critical account of the literature on the topic and contributes with original research. We first revise models of mechanism design and sequential bargaining that take confrontation as final....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008465156
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010896464