Showing 1 - 8 of 8
We provide an explanation for why committees may behave over-cautiously. A committee of experts makes a decision on a proposed innovation on behalf of 'society'. Each expert's signal about the innovation's quality is generated by the available evidence and the best practices of the experts'...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010195361
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010348129
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012818822
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012195504
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011793382
We provide an explanation for why committees may behave over-cautiously. A committee of experts makes a decision on a proposed innovation on behalf of 'society'. Each expert's signal about the innovation's quality is generated by the available evidence and the best practices of the experts'...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010331153
We provide an explanation for why committees may behave over-cautiously. A committee of experts makes a decision on a proposed innovation on behalf of 'society'. Each expert's signal about the innovation's quality is generated by the available evidence and the best practices of the experts'...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010983238
In this paper, we demonstrate that payoffs linked to a committee member's individual vote may explain over-cautious behavior in committees. A committee of experts must decide whether to approve or reject a proposed innovation on behalf of society. In addition to a payoff linked to the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010735442