Showing 1 - 10 of 22
We study committees that acquire information, deliberate and vote. A member cares about state-dependent decision payoffs and about his reputation for expertise. The state remains unobserved, even after the decision has been taken. In such inconclusive environments, in equilibrium, a member's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011895815
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014288040
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003348232
This paper is concerned with the role of committees in collective decision-makingprocesses in a world where agents must be motivated to collect information. Committees improvethe quality of decision-making by providing information and by coordinating the collection ofinformation. We address two...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011332816
We identify the conditions under which voters can induce political parties to collect information and to select policies which are optimal from the representative voter’s point of view. We show that when parties are office motivated the voting rule should encourage parties to collect...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011334829
A well-known rationale for representative democracy is that direct democracy leads to a free-rider problem as to the collection of information. A problem with this rationale is that it takes for granted that representatives collect information. In this paper we examine whether or not electoral...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011342563
The collection of information necessary fordecision-making is often delegated to agents (e.g. bureaucrats,advisors, lawyers). If both the pros and cons of a decision haveto be examined, it is better to use competing agents instead of asingle agent. The reason is that two conflicting pieces...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011326399
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002216665
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001993175
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002503527