Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Many current bankruptcy debates—from critical vendor orders to the Supreme Court's decision last year in Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corporation—begin with bankruptcy's distributional rules and questions about how much discretion a judge should have in applying them. It is a mistake, however,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012853018
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001352110
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001022065
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001332149
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001622007
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001141167
The Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation creates an “Orderly Liquidation Authority” (OLA) that shares many features in common with the Bankruptcy Code. This is easy to overlook because the legislation uses a language and employs a decision-maker (both borrowed from bank regulation) that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013122075
In RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v Amalgamated Bank, the Supreme Court's statutory interpretation focuses on an emerging theme of its bankruptcy jurisprudence: the proper domain of the bankruptcy judge. While one might expect the Court to approach that question of domain as it has for administrative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013086574
Bankruptcy scholarship is largely a debate about the comparative merits of a mandatory regime on one hand and bankruptcy by free design on the other. By the standard account, the current law of corporate reorganization is mandatory. Various rules that cannot be avoided ensure that investors'...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013091784
Over the last few years, reorganization practice has undergone a massive change. A new device — the restructuring support agreement — has transformed Chapter 11 negotiations. This puts reorganization law at a crossroads. Chapter 11's commitment to a nonmarket restructuring with a rigid...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012994255