Showing 1 - 6 of 6
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009576472
Purpose – This paper seeks is to enhance our understanding of intangible recognition by embracing an artefact‐based approach. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents an artefact‐based approach to intangible asset recognition, an artefact being a physical and visual...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014873041
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present asset recognition criteria based on the idea that an asset should be functional, separable and measurable and that financial recognition should be triggered by the recognition of an artefact. Design/methodology/approach – Criteria is applied...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014875566
This paper presents an examination of the cognitive assumptions underpinning the accounting recognition of assets, in particular, internally created intangible assets such as brands, software and patents. The purpose is to examine, in broad terms, how accountants view these assets and, also, to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014932166
Examines the weaknesses of the current UK and US definitions of an asset. Presents an argument for them to be updated to include valuable internally created intangible assets, such as brands and software, which currently fall outside the scope of them.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014933911
Addresses the UK accounting definition of an asset from a practical, theoretical and critical perspective. It suggests that it is a flawed definition in need of change. The accounting definition (UK and US) recognises assets arising from a “transaction or event”, a basis which, inter alia ,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014933922