Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003304493
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002198217
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001431712
This essay argues that, while intellectual property (IP) and antitrust often operate as complementary bodies of law, in some residuum of cases there will be widespread disagreement among forecasters about whether antitrust constraints on the exercise of IP rights are likely to inhibit or promote...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012823886
Courts in many countries continue to follow the traditional practice of awarding the prevailing patent owner a permanent injunction, absent exceptional circumstances. First-generation law-and-economics scholarship, building on Calabresi and Melamed's work on property and liability rules, largely...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012867362
The conventional wisdom that antitrust is less tolerant of monopoly than is intellectual property (IP) law is sometimes true, but there is another side of the coin that is less frequently commented upon and that deserves further scrutiny. On occasion, IP law condemns conduct on the part of IP...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012711843
In June 2021, the United States Supreme Court held, in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, that plaintiffs lack standing to assert claims for statutory damages under the Fair Credit Reporting Act unless they can demonstrate “concrete harm” arising from those violations. Although TransUnion was not a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013289379
Standard setting organizations often require their members to declare which of their patents are essential to the practice of a prospective standard, and to agree to license any such standard-essential patents (SEPs) on "fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory" (FRAND) terms. Among the issues...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013063129
Courts and commentators have recently begun to confront the issue of whether a product configuration that has been disclosed in a utility patent can serve as protectable trade dress under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. In the view of some, such configurations necessarily enter the public...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014204507
Courts and commentators have recently begun to confront the issue of whether a product configuration that has been disclosed in a utility patent can serve as protectable trade dress under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. In the view of some, such configurations necessarily enter the public...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014204508