Showing 1 - 10 of 33
We analyse river sharing games in which a set of agents located along a river shares the available water. Using coalition theory, we find that the potential benefits of water trade may not be sufficient to make all agents in the river cooperate and acknowledge property rights as a prerequisite...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010464793
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011746369
We analyse river sharing games in which a set of agents located along a river shares the available water. Using coalition theory, we find that the potential benefits of water trade may not be su cient to make all agents in the river cooperate and acknowledge property rights as a prerequisite for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010339310
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012286904
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012322308
We augment the standard cartel formation game from non-cooperative coalition theory, often applied in the context of international environmental agreements, with the possibility that singletons support coalition formation without becoming coalition members themselves. We assume their support...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012972213
This paper examines stability of international climate agreements for carbon abatement under an optimal transfer rule and renegotiations. The optimal transfer rule suggested to stabilise international environmental agreements (Weikard 2005, Carraro, Eyckmans and Finus 2006) is no longer optimal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003715099
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003331263
Almost all international environmental agreements include a minimum participation rule. Under such a rule an agreement becomes legally binding if and only if a certain threshold in terms of membership or contribution is reached. We analyze a cartel game with open membership and heterogeneous...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003883288
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003867560