Showing 1 - 10 of 2,016
This paper scrutinizes the effects of investor-state dispute settlements (ISDS) and national treatment provisions in a two-period model where foreign investment is subject to domestic regulation and a holdup problem. It shows that ISDS can mitigate the holdup problem and increases aggregate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011431559
Much has been recently written about the Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI) that has been negotiated by OECD countries. Perhaps even more has been said by the critics of those who would like to see an agreement of this kind extended among other countries. There has indeed been a great...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010229104
During the last decade the world stock of foreign direct investment has more than doubled. Nevertheless, considerable impediments to FDI continue to exist. The following paper discusses these and offers an answer to the question as to whether multilateral rules on FDI are necessary to remove...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011547236
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011563828
Legal conflicts between multinational firms and host governments are often decided by international arbitration panels - as opposed to courts in the host country - due to provisions in international investment agreements known as Investor State Dispute Settlements (ISDS). Critics fear that ISDS...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011565569
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010396541
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010496070
Developing countries have increasingly engaged in Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) to attract foreign investors. While it is found that BITs are successful in attracting FDI, we argue that the effectiveness of BITs depends on the type of FDI. We find the effect of BITs to differ importantly...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010234548
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013163090
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012622699