Showing 1 - 10 of 16
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012059737
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011623949
This paper assesses the relationship between risk-shifting of mutual funds, measured as benchmark-adjusted factor-based investment style change following a structural break, and their risk-adjusted performance. We isolate only the breaks in style risk beyond those embedded in the funds’...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014351804
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014470970
In this study we re-visit the performance of 887 active UK equity mutual funds using a new approach proposed by Angelidis, Giamouridis and Tessaromatis (2013). The authors argue that mutual funds stock selection is driven by the benchmark index, so if the benchmark generates alpha, there will be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013001539
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012207063
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012207515
In this paper we provide critical review of recent developments in the mutual fund performance evaluation literature. The new literature centres around two main themes: enhancing explanatory power of the standard Fama-French-Carhart factor models by augmenting them with different factors and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012908928
This study re-visits the question of benchmark mismatch among 1281 US equity mutual funds and its impact on benchmark-adjusted fund performance and ranking. All funds report S&P500 index as a prospectus benchmark, yet 2/3 of those are placed in the Morningstar category with risk and objectives...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012950444
We assess UK mutual fund performance from a perspective of a peer-group, applying a novel approach suggested in Hunter et al. (2014). Our sample comprises of 817 UK long-only active equity mutual funds allocated to nine Morningstar style category peer-groups in the period 1992-2016. Overall, we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012950746