Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011460434
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013279790
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011927141
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012166855
Theoretical models imply fund size and performance should be negatively linked. However, empiricists have failed to uncover consistent support for this negative relation. Using a new econometric framework which includes fund-specific sensitivities to decreasing returns to scale, we find a both...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012901686
Final working paper version. "" Published version: The Review of Financial Studies, Volume 31, Issue 7, July 2018, pp. 2499–2552. Past fund performance does a poor job of predicting future outcomes. The reason is noise. Using a random effects framework, we reduce the noise by pooling...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012855889
Both Kosowski et al. (2006) and Fama and French (2010) evaluate whether mutual funds outperform, but their conclusions are very different. We reconcile their findings. We show that the Fama and French method suffers from an undersampling problem that leads to a failure to reject the null...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013323960
We show that the standard equation-by-equation OLS used in performance evaluation ignores information in the alpha population and leads to severely biased estimates for the alpha population. We propose a new framework that treats fund alphas as random effects. Our framework allows us to make...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012456541
We show that the standard equation-by-equation OLS used in performance evaluation ignores information in the alpha population and leads to severely biased estimates for the alpha population. We propose a new framework that treats fund alphas as random effects. Our framework allows us to make...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012995517