Showing 1 - 10 of 5,611
We propose two simple evaluation methods for time varying density forecasts of continuous higher dimensional random variables. Both methods are based on the probability integral transformation for unidimensional forecasts. The first method tests multinormal densities and relies on the rotation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013138453
The catastrophic failures of risk management systems in 2008 bring to the forefront the need for accurate and flexible estimators of market risk. Despite advances in the theory and practice of evaluating risk, existing measures are notoriously poor predictors of loss in high-quantile events. To...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013100621
In this paper, we analyze new possibilities in predicting daily ranges, i.e. differences between daily high and low prices. We empirically assess efficiency gains in volatility estimation when using range-based estimators as opposed to simple daily ranges and explore the use of these more...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010461231
In this paper, we estimate, model and forecast Realized Range Volatility, a new realized measure and estimator of the quadratic variation of financial prices. This estimator was early introduced in the literature and it is based on the high-low range observed at high frequency during the day. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013130487
In this paper, we use factor-augmented HAR-type models to predict the daily integrated volatility of asset returns. Our approach is based on a proposed two-step dimension reduction procedure designed to extract latent common volatility factors from a large dimensional and high-frequency returns...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012952724
An increase in the number of asset pricing models intensifies model uncertainties in assetpricing. While a pure "model selection" (singling out a best model) can result in a loss of usefulinformation, a full “model pooling” may increase the risk of including noisy information.We make a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012853526
We use machine learning methods to predict stock return volatility. Our out-of-sample prediction of realised volatility for a large cross-section of US stocks over the sample period from 1992 to 2016 is on average 44.1% against the actual realised volatility of 43.8% with an R2 being as high as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012800743
We develop a penalized two-pass regression with time-varying factor loadings. The penalization in the first pass enforces sparsity for the time-variation drivers while also maintaining compatibility with the no arbitrage restrictions by regularizing appropriate groups of coefficients. The second...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012487589
This paper proposes a novel decomposition of realized volatility (RV) into moderate and extreme realized volatility estimates. These estimates behave like long and short term components of volatility, and are very different from either realized semi-variance or the continuous and jump components...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012864091
We evaluate the performance of several linear and nonlinear machine learning models in forecasting the realized volatility (RV) of ten global stock market indices in the period from January 2000 to December 2021. We train models using a dataset which includes past values of the RV and additional...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014076641