Showing 1 - 10 of 11
We study 6,686 IPOs spanning the period 1981-2005 and find that the new issues puzzle disappears in a Fama-French three-factor framework. IPOs do not underperform in the aftermarket on a risk-adjusted basis and do not underperform a matched sample of non-issuers. IPO underperformance is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013116834
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009541523
The divergence of opinion model originally proposed by Miller (1977) has recently received a great deal of attention. Focusing on the unique offering process of Japanese seasoned equity offerings (SEOs), we are able to directly test the Miller model. A comparable analysis cannot be performed on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013109060
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013533438
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003992778
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010437261
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011478537
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001098657
The distinct regulatory design of Indian IPOs permits an empirical evaluation of IPO underpricing models against those that model IPO initial returns as a consequence of overpricing. Characteristics of the Indian bookbuilding process allow us to study the timing and subscription patterns of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013128440
Explores the relationship between the short-term and long-term returns of initial public offerings (IPOs) and the reputation of the underwriters associated with the IPOs. Previous work in this area has shown that use of reputable underwriters for the IPO leads to less short-run underpricing....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013154527