Showing 1 - 10 of 13
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003897918
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009504230
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009668380
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011699208
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011699236
Developing countries reject meaningful emission targets (recent intensity caps are no exception), while many industrialized countries insist that developing countries accept them. This impasse has prevented the Kyoto Protocol from establishing a global price for greenhouse gas emissions. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014200558
“Hopes are fading that a strong treaty will emerge from next month’s negotiations in Copenhagen,” according to Nature Geoscience (2009/11). This short book starts from Nature’s critique of the “targets and timetables” approach to international agreement and describes an international...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014201190
The Kyoto Protocol’s approach of assigning emission targets, or “caps,” exacerbates problems with international cooperation and commitment. This has caused the developing countries, which account for the fastest growing half of emissions, to reject caps. Global carbon pricing addresses...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014206046
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012751137
This paper solves the global cap-and-trade game exactly as the public-goods game is normally solved and finds a problematic outcome. Abatement of greenhouse gas emissions is a global public good, and supplying a public good is a game with strong incentives to free ride. Adding a cap-and-trade...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014195754