Showing 1 - 10 of 19
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009627392
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010242904
While incentive framing has been shown to promote workers' effort, little is known about how it affects other dimensions of the employer-employee relationship. This paper examines whether incentive framing can also influence workers propensity to engage in an activity disloyal to their employer:...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013050810
Synopsis of whole book instead of Abstract: This volume provides a comprehensive review of the empirical evidence on corruption generated by recent laboratory and field experiments conducted by economists and political scientists. The first part of the volume reviews the evidence produced by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013050812
This paper reports on a controlled field experiment on corruption designed to address two important issues: the experimenter's scrutiny and the unobservability of corruption. In the experiment, a grader is offered a bribe along with a demand for a better grade. We find that graders respond more...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013050817
This paper makes an attempt at testing the external validity of corruption experiments by moving from the lab in a developed country, to where it matters the most, the field in a developing country. In our experiment a candidate proposes a bribe to a grader in order to obtain a better grade. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014211602
We analyse policy makers' incentives to fight corruption under different institutional qualities. We find that 'public officials', even when non-corrupt, significantly distort anti-corruption institutions by choosing a lower detection probability when this probability applies to their own...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011517268
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012818127
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012237705
In our framed laboratory experiment, two Public Officials, A and B, make consecutive decisions regarding embezzlement from separate funds. Official B observes Official A’s decision before making their own. There are four treatments: three with deterrence and one without. We find a peer effect...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011568192