Showing 1 - 10 of 12
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011391381
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010505429
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011895009
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011348960
First-differencing is generally taken to imply the loss of one observation, the first, or at least that the effect of ignoring this observation is asymptotically negligible. However, this is not always true, as in the case of GLS detrending. In order to illustrate this, the current paper...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010741271
This paper analyzes the role of initialization when testing for a unit root in panel data, an issue that has received surprisingly little attention in the literature. In fact, most studies assume that the initial value is either zero or bounded. As a response to this, the current paper considers...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010741277
Ng (2008) shows how the cross-sectional variance of the observed panel data can be used to construct a simple test for the proportion of non-stationary units. However, in the case with incidental trends the test is distorted. The present note shows how the distortions can be substantially...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011076542
The current paper considers the asymptotic local power of second-generation panel unit root tests that are robust to the presence of cross-section dependence in the form of common factors. As a basis for our analysis, we take the PANIC approach of Bai and Ng (2004, 2010), which is one of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011190726
This paper proposes new unit root tests in the context of a random autoregressive coefficient panel data model, in which the null of a unit root corresponds to the joint restriction that the autoregressive coefficient has unit mean and zero variance. The asymptotic distributions of the test...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010574088
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011500261