Showing 1 - 10 of 11
This paper considers the treatment of co-benefits in benefit-cost analysis of federal air quality regulations. Using a comprehensive data set on all major Clean Air Act rules issued by the Environmental Protection Agency over the period 1997-2019, we show that (1) co-benefits make up a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012547951
As of late 2020, the Trump administration had initiated almost one hundred rollbacks of U.S. environmental regulations. A careful assessment of the benefits and costs of rolling back an existing regulation can and should inform such decisions. When assessing the potential rollback of an existing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012548013
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013202159
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012225637
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012265513
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012508865
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015049875
We synthesize and review retrospective analyses of federal air quality regulations to examine the contributions of the Clean Air Act to the vast air quality improvements seen since 1970. Geographic heterogeneity in stringency affects emissions, public health, compliance costs, and employment....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013312739
Since 1970, transportation, power generation, and manufacturing have dramatically transformed as air pollutant emissions have fallen significantly. To evaluate the causal impacts of the Clean Air Act on these changes, we synthesize and review retrospective analyses of air quality regulations....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012479211
This paper considers the treatment of co-benefits in benefit-cost analysis of federal air quality regulations. Using a comprehensive data set on all major Clean Air Act rules issued by the Environmental Protection Agency over the period 1997-2019, we show that (1) co-benefits make up a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012481456