Showing 1 - 10 of 3,002
Traditionally, fund managers cast votes on behalf of investors whose capital they manage. Recently, this system has come under intense debate given the growing concentration of voting power among a few asset managers and disagreements over environmental and social issues. Major fund managers now...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014337868
This paper investigates whether and how various characteristics of CEOs and corporate boards are related to the severity of corporate governance problems within firms. The latter is proxied by private benefits of control, which we measure for dual class stock firms using the voting premium...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013121352
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013459395
We derive a measure that captures the extent to which common ownership shifts managers' incentives to internalize externalities. A key feature of the measure is that it allows for the possibility that not all investors are attentive to whether a manager's actions benefit the investor's overall...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012899520
Shareholder say-on-pay votes allow institutional investors to influence the incentives of managers and, consequently, corporate behaviour. Surprisingly, the preferences of investors on executive compensation have been largely overlooked in the ongoing debates on sustainable corporate behaviour....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014254709
We examine the influence of proxy advisors on firms’ shareholder engagement behavior. Our analyses exploit a quasi-natural experiment using Say-On-Pay voting outcomes near a threshold that triggers a review of engagement activities by Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Firms receiving...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012586749
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010239132
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013252930
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012259090
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011807483